|
|
|
Issue No.8 Spring 2002
Perturbing Perceptions
By John Nixon
The BBC's current affairs programme Spotlight which focussed on demographic
changes and projections on forthcoming censal data is undoubtedly a timely event
given current media interest on increasing alienation and lack of confidence
within the Unionist communities. This appears to be in contrast to a perceived
growing confidence among nationalists/republicans. One clear theme emerged;
Unionists feel threatened and no longer feel secure under the Union. They feel
that they are becoming second class citizens in what they were given to believe
was a Protestant state for a Protestant people. Their once perceived privileged
position has gone and the Union is not looking so safe. Unionism it appears is
again at the crossroads only this time round there are deeper divisions and a
lacking in clear direction as to what route they should go. The traditional
routes of displays of militarism, orange cards and threats of bloodbaths no
longer cut any ice. The changes long predicted are here. Unionists are beginning
to face up to stark realities. Patterns and trends of thinking within working
class Unionist communities in particular have emerged since John Reid's not so
well timed address to the Institute of Irish Studies at Liverpool University.
Having listened to the opinion of a number of people from grassroots Unionism I
feel there is an inability to objectively assess or analyse what has happened
over the past decades at both macro and micro levels as to why Unionists feel a
sense of alienation. John Reid's 'cold house' theory has brought many issues
into focus but has also hyped up specific grievances which from my own
republican perspective are essentially of lesser substance. The predominant
perception among working class loyalists is that they are being 'sold out' by
politicians and by the British administration who no longer want them. There is
a perception that only Catholics are the real benefactors under the new
political structures. Clichés such as 'The Taigs are getting everything and we
get nothing', 'violence has paid off', 'Catholics are united and we are divided'
'While we were drinking the Catholics were thinking' provide insights to current
thinking among Unionist grassroots.
Maybe that is just the problem; all clichés and little articulation. Invariably
there follows the blame game and the 'what aboutery' and all sides are equally
prone to this and have their own sense of victimhood and who were perpetrators
and inevitably the past is raked up, the present is confused and the future is
uncertain. Clichés, denials and allegations tend to fog certain realities.
Quite a number of Unionists perceive that gains made by the Catholic community
since the outbreak of the Troubles have been at the expense of their community.
Nationalists and republicans feel that everything gained is as much to the
benefit of Unionists as their own community. They feel they had little or
nothing to lose. There is a perception in particular among working class
Protestants that they are being held culpable by Catholics for decades of
discrimination and oppression under a Unionist oligarchy despite the fact that
they too were denied the franchise and were equally neglected. Many Protestants
morally supported the aims of the Civil Rights Movement and undeniably there was
as much deprivation and poverty on both sides of the working class divide. The
advent of the republican armed struggle heralded a new dimension to communal and
religious divisions that were not so dormant as some revisionists would have us
believe. Now four years into a cease-fire the pain and trauma Unionists
experienced as a result of republican violence appears to be made more acute by
the fact that they feel violence has paid off.
The Provisional IRA's failure to express remorse is seen by them as a major
obstacle to healing the divisions of the past. Gerry Adam's statement that there
cannot be a united Ireland (or an 'agreed Ireland') without the assent or
consent of Unionists appears to have little impact among working class Unionists
and coupled with this is their sense of being abandoned by middle Unionism
though many continue to vote for mainstream Unionist parties. There is also a
perception among Protestants living in interface areas that loyalist
paramilitaries are a necessary evil; that despite their many shortcomings they
can still muster communal support even though they derive little or no electoral
support. The UDA hollowly boast they have sixty thousand men on their books.
They're certainly not on the electoral register. Ask nine out of ten UDA
supporters who they vote for they will tell you the DUP.
In other arenas of change, e.g. legislation such as the Equality Act, the Human
Rights Bill and the Criminal Justice Bill, there is a belief particularly within
grassroots Unionism that proposed changes serve to address a
nationalist/republican agenda .ämore concessions! In this respect they seem to
be emulating the wincing and whinging going on within mainstream Unionism over
the same.
While much of Unionist comment has some validity if probed it would be found
wanting in quantifiable terms. Realities such as demographic changes, e.g.
Catholic majorities in cities such as Derry, Belfast and Armagh, increased
electoral support for republicans (things have changed at City Hall!) a
diminishing Protestant population and the dilution of the border within the
context of a unified Europe are issues on which working class loyalists don't
seem to focus or engage more fully. Unionists can't blame the 'Troubles' or
republican violence for unprecedented levels of industrial decline in aircraft
or shipbuilding, in the textile or manufacturing industry or agriculture.
Neither can republicans be blamed for an identity crisis within Unionism or the
fact that the 'gaols are crammed with working class Protestants'. They can't be
blamed for pipe bomb attacks/deaths or naked sectarian murders or the murder of
those who work in the media or the legal profession or for creating or fostering
divisions which stem back to the Plantation (and beyond). Republicans are
prepared to listen and respond to Unionist fears and grievances. Sensitive
issues such as policing, the full implementation of the Patten Report and the
Good Friday Agreement remain as priorities on their agenda.
Yet there is an empathy with Unionists who feel they have been abandoned by
successive British governments; republicans had been abandoned by success Irish
republican governments ä or hanged by them. But differences aside there is also
a need to focus on our shared history; both communities faced a common enemy
during two world wars, both lay claim to a Christian heritage via St Patrick,
the legacy of United Irishmen and contemporary sporting achievements, etc.
Issues such the drugs culture, anti-social crime and the problems facing or
created by young people are endemic on both sides of the divide as is
racketeering and intimidation.
Clearly there is much work to be done to restore and build trust and confidence
between the communities. Maybe more so now than at any time there is a need for
republicans/nationalists to assuage Unionist fears and counteract those who are
determined to exploit those fears. The reasons why such fears exist require a
more thorough and informed analysis. Probably more than at any time there is a
need to allay fears and suspicions on all sides. After so many years of strife
and polarisation it is no surprise that there are many bitter legacies of our
troubled past.
|