|
|
|||
|
Issue No.16 Spring 2004
Over the Christmas period 478
people decided to take the risk and drive while under the influence of
alcohol. The numbers are up by 82 on the same period last year. Disappointing
indeed to say the least. The head of PSNIs Road Policing Development
Branch Supt. Hamill stated that, of course means that 478 people
are now looking at the inevitable prospect of losing their licences, their
jobs, and in effect their livelihoods. We said at the outset of the campaign
that there would be no hiding place for those who drink and drive. The
figures from across the Province show that we lived up to that determination.
Grim statistics indeed! Despite
TV and newspaper ad campaigns over Christmas, despite an increased presence
on the roads, and despite all the admonitions and advice not to drink
and drive its hard to believe that people still do it. They think
they wont get caught. They think it will be okay this time, excuses
seem to come handy, and before they know it the sound of the siren and
the flashing lights signal the reality of drink driving. The law, both
legal and moral will make them accountable. But it doesnt just end
there. In todays society not having a car or licence to drive is
a major deficit especially when youve been used to or dependent
on one. However, is there anything else
that will discourage drivers from drinking and driving whilst unfit? One
possibility, is the exorbitant cost of soft drinks such as cola, fruit
juice, etc., in relation to alcoholic drinks. I personally have experienced
this in many places, North and South, and in Europe. A large Coke and
a Ballygowan sparkling water cost ¤6.50, whereas a pint and a half
of beer costs ¤5.85. That huge mark-up on the cost of soft drinks
does little to encourage drivers to refrain from alcohol. Indeed, in my
view it has the opposite effect! Why pay more for something not really
enjoyed. Why not take a chance and enjoy a beer or two, costing less,
and take the risk of not being caught driving by the police on the way
home? This rip-off in relation to the cost of non-alcoholic drinks has been highlighted many times over recent years. Edinburgh Evening News journalist Brian Ferguson revealed that Trading Standards Officers from Edinburgh council found the price of a mineral water was as expensive as £2.50 in some licensed premises. In the same article Edinburgh City Councillor Marilyne MacLaren stated there was no excuse for pubs charging such exorbitant prices for soft drinks. She urged publicans to peg their prices for soft drinks and encourage them to offer designateddrivers either discount or free soft drinks. Maybe those 478 people caught over the Christmas period (not to mention those unaccounted who were not) in retrospect would have willingly paid the extortionist prices for soft drinks rather than be in the position they find themselves at present. It seems there is no real incentive; certainly not in the bars hotels and restaurants. People feel they are being callously exploited by greedy publicans and manufacturers who are fixing prices and its the ordinary punters at the end of the day who are paying dearly for it in more ways than one. Next time you purchase a bottle of Coke in your local supermarket at £1.00 per 2 litre or a glass of Coke (or water) in the pub at £2.50 then take time to ponder the difference. It could cost you a lot more than an arm and a leg! |
|||
|
|
|||